was cute even with bat ears :) cuter... now is hotter... hard choice between the two stages! I think I like most the first one
I prefer his body in the first pic as well. Its more naturally muscled and smooth, looks cleaner and just a lot more to like about it.
According to his blog (Google him), today (9/7) is his 23rd birthday! He has some hot friends, btw.You can just barely see the fine wispy chest hair in the top photo, so it was just a matter of getting a bit older--now the poor boy has to clip to keep it neat.
I don't mind the bat ears (lol at the term; it's not even that bad) in the first one but I definitely prefer the second one because of the hair!Hair (as long as it's not bear like) > Hairless
not wanting to be critical of his hair growth cause its who he is ... but prefer the first pic as well less hair works better for his face
OMG - well, guys, that's less competition for me, so thanks!! LOL The first pic makes it clear he was destined to be hot, but the second pic is the one that drives this gay boy crazy! I wish he had a tiny bit MORE hair... but I'd take him in a heartbeat as is!
The 'bat ears' do make you notice, but I still prefer how he looks in this first pic. He looks very cute, smooth and fresh and clean-cut in this one.
Max is good looking in both but he did look better in first (younger?) smooth bod pic.
How much of a time difference is there between the two pictures? He was a cute boy in the first one, but he second one, he has matured into a hot man. I like the hair too :-) My blog has sexy guys on it too http://theirishfishbowl.blogspot.com/ Thanks from Dan
Fine solid A in first pic, but I think more a B or B+ in the second more hairy look.
Second pic is the clear winner to me. I'd say A-. First pic, C+.
Much better in 1st/He should be kept shaved
Post a Comment